Uni Books (And Genres) They Need To Take Off The Syllabus

I really debated over what to call this post. One possible title was just “Why? Why do professors set these trainwrecks?” or just “Why god why??” Some of these books are specific to my uni, but that doesn’t change the fact that these books should not be on any reading list- *anywhere*.

robinsons crusoe1. Robinson Crusoe– why do they still teach this? No one, not even the lecturers, like this book. Its main claim to fame is that it was the first novel written in English. That’s all very well and good- but does that make it a good read? Nope. It could just be a footnote in the University syllabus, but instead they make countless students endure this interminably dull book every year. All I can say to people that study English Literature in the future is you have my deepest sympathies.

ben franklin2. Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography– while this isn’t truly as godawful as some of the other books on this list, it is realllly dry and very boring. I cannot quite understand why it was set because it’s not really known for being of any literary merit.



pilgrim's progress3. Pilgrim’s Progress– this could be another footnote in literature. In my opinion, it’s overzealous claptrap designed to indoctrinate. I wouldn’t recommend it- if you want to know more about the New Testament, I’d recommend you just read the New Testament- ironically it’s better written, more entertaining and surprisingly feels less like you’re being hit over the head with religious propaganda. One plus is that both the author’s name and title is admittedly pretty epic.


on the road4. On the Road by Jack Kerouac– Yeah… so I’m not a fan of this. Sorry- but I just don’t like things where I have no idea what’s going on or what the point is. And while we’re on the subject, I don’t much like the Beat Generation either. This book was weird, boring and had no plot. I did not enjoy reading it and I think the only reason why people are into this stuff is because they think it’s really deep and meaningful. Sorry to burst your bubble- it’s not deep and meaningful- the Beat poets were just really, really high. And when you’re high, lampshades become deep and meaningful.

mrs warren's profession5. Mrs Warren’s Profession by Bernard Shaw– I. Am. Not. A. Fan. Of. Bernard Shaw. Period. Seriously- this play was such a waste of time- I don’t know why we were set it. I reckon Shaw is one of *the most overrated playwrights of *any century*. His writing is very staid and his plays read like novels. There’s just no action in them. On top of that, the characters are bland and there is no drama! Don’t go into it expecting anything like the My Fair Lady musical, that’s all I can tell you.

I also have to say that I don’t know why we were set this when the other play that week was Waiting for Godot– which is incredible. Sometimes tutors just have no taste.

mrs dalloway6. Mrs Dalloway by Virginia Woolf– I have no shame admitting that I have never finished any of her books. They’re just boring as hell. I’m not going to pretend like I’m an especially big fan of stream of consciousness writing, but Virginia Woolf has my particular ire for being the worst. It’s pretentious, dull rubbish and I’m not a fan. On a side note- no one actually likes James Joyce either- I’d say luckily I was set this book instead of Ulysses, but I didn’t enjoy (what I did manage to read of) it- so it’s not like I escaped the horrors of this movement.


Maria_Magdalene_praying7. Sentimental literature– I could probably fill a book with why this is dumb. For some reason, in the 18th century people decided that creating an emotional response from their reader was the most important thing, so they set about making the most contrived cases of so-called “catharsis” known to man. Or something like that. They actually used to go to mental institutions and watch crazy people, so that they could go away and cry afterwards. Apparently it was very cathartic. Most of the books involve some weird retelling of somebody’s tragic life story and a main character that feels the best response they can have to hearing someone else’s problems is to have a good cry. And spying on people with mental health problems a lot. I’m not kidding. I read a couple of these lousy books for my course- I don’t remember the titles, but it’s not like I’m going to recommend you read them, so it doesn’t matter. Just avoid this genre at all costs. And if you ever get set anything from this period, go off sick that week- it’s not like you’re going to learn anything useful from it.

One positive thing that did come out of this movement, however, and that was Austen’s Sense and Sensibility, which was a satire on this genre. But that just goes to show that this could be another footnote in University to preface teaching more Austen- which would actually be worthwhile.

phantastes8. Phantastes– just what is even happening in this book? I mean, it made literally no sense. It just jumps around from one scene to the other with no logic or explanation. It’s a really confusing read. And (if I remember correctly) it’s got one of those “it was all a dream” endings. You know, the type where, basically nothing in the book actually mattered because they return to the real world as if nothing happened. I vaguely recollect this being taught because it had something to do with the birth of fantasy- but I honestly can’t remember what. I pretty much switched off because the book was so weird. I’m pretty sure they just set it because it was Scottish, and my uni, being in Scotland decided they had to ram as much Scottish stuff down our throat as possible- whether it was good or not. (Not that I’m complaining about the good stuff, cos who doesn’t love some Robert Louis Stevenson?)

house with the green shutters9. House with the Green Shutters– This is another one that was particular to my university, because they just *had to* have a Scottish book to set that week. And my tutor *had to pick this* over Jude the Obscure (I swear that woman had no taste). Basically, it’s just one of those books that could have been done better in every way- the message is too obvious, the characters don’t have good enough motivations and the foreshadowing is about as blatant as a foghorn. It’s not the worst book on this list by a long shot, but it’s not great, and if you were looking for a dark, Victorian book, I would recommend, well, Jude of course.

10. De Montfort by Joanna Bailie– “What’s that? I’ve never heard of it,” I hear you say. Well that’s because no one has. We did this cos my tutor hated romantic poetry (basically they were an idiot) so they chose this book instead. That being said there is *no way* this play should be on any reading list- ever. If I want to pinpoint the exact moment when I realised academia was a load of nonsense, it would be when I was told to read this dumb play.

Basically, the premise is it’s a tragedy about hatred. There are no other emotions or anything of note in the play, just endless monologues about how De Montfort hates some guy for some reason (it’s never really clear why). It was part of a series of plays by the self-dubbed genius Joanna Bailie, who had the bright idea of writing plays about a different emotion each time. Yup, she had all the genius of a 12 year old. Understandably, the play was a complete flop when it was first performed, only running for eight nights and was poorly received by critics. And since it’s so unpopular, there aren’t any pictures on the internet for it, so I’ve just put a picture of an angry cat.

angry cat

So yeah, I have no idea why this play was set at my uni- other than that it was written by someone both Scottish and a woman. Which is not the best reason to read a book- they’d have been better off setting Catherine Macphail. Undoubtedly, this is the worst book on this list, cos it is truly godawful.

Bonus: Imagism- just cos. (See- that’s nice and precise, an imagist would love me).

That’s it for this list. Have you had to endure any of these books- either at school or at uni? Have you encountered them anywhere else? 

And on a side note- did anyone else have to lug around those nightmarishly big Norton Anthologies?

20 thoughts on “Uni Books (And Genres) They Need To Take Off The Syllabus

  1. Oh my gawd. This post brings me waaay back…. I had to read Margaret Atwood and Michael Ondaatje, and I HATED them both. SO boring. The English Patient? Shoot me now. Surfacing? Death by a thousand paper cuts. I haven’t been able to read anything of theirs since, and that was a long time ago. Fabulous post!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. omg I read On the Road. Yes it was awful. Yet they praise this idiot writerbecause he busted out a whole manuscript when he was high on drugs (I think??) And you’re right, it HAD NO PLOT. I don’t understand why this is a celebrated piece of lit at all. I have never actually heard of any of the other books but I’m from the US and I didn’t major in Lit soo… A book I think needs to be added to this list is Moby Dick.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yup- I know- I don’t get why they revered it so much! It’s a load of garbage. *Nothing happens* and *no-0ne in it is interesting!*
      Trust me they’re not worth reading- you had a lucky escape!!
      I’ve not read that (I’m from the UK, and even though I did an American Lit module, it modernism)


      1. Gasp. You’ve never read Moby dick??? Ahh wow well it was an advanced English reading I had to do in high school in a world lit class. It’s terribly boring. About a man hunting a whale. About 50 % of it is literally scientific crap about whales. People consider it a ckassic….still can’t figure out why. I’m probably making real lit people cringe

        Liked by 1 person

  3. I haven’t had to read any of these but they sound pretty dull. I did read To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolfe and I need those precious moments of my life that I lost reading her boring boring boring boring boring book back. Too bad you can’t get back lost time.😆

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Great post! The only one of the above I’ve even attempted was Mrs Dalloway and I’m 100% with you… I’d never read any Virginia Woolf before so voluntarily decided I’d give it a go. Needless to say I got a few pages in and realised the foolishness of this decision!! I was so exasperated I googled it to see if something was likely to happen later in the book. Wikipedia informed me it wasn’t, so I happily gave up and sold my copy through my university’s secondhand bookstore (knowing some unfortunate student would be forced to read it at some point… sure enough it sold within a few weeks!).

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks very much! None of these books are worth attempting, to be fair, but Mrs Dalloway is up there with *the absolute worst*. I’ve tried to read two of her books: To The Lighthouse (it was supposed to be for fun, but it quickly turned out to be a chore and I gave up) and Mrs Dalloway (for uni- I did the exact same thing as you and googled it for my tutorial!) I don’t know what happened to my copy- hopefully it’s been recycled into something useful- like the wrapping for fish and chips. I can’t bear the thought of it being inflicted on some other poor unfortunate soul!

      Liked by 1 person

    1. haha well some people like Mrs Dalloway- so you might too- I don’t know… let me know either way. As for On the Road… I dunno how to see the upside for that one- it’s excruciating- I don’t know anyone that likes it… you could be the first I guess? On the bright side you’re not doing sentimental literature!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s