An Exhaustive Study of Why the Goldfinch is Too Long

The_goldfinch_by_donna_tartI’ll try to be brief- or as brief as I can be with a rant about Tartt’s supposed “masterpiece”. As you can probably tell from the title, I’m not so sure I succeeded.

Let’s start with the positives, shall we? The Goldfinch painting by Fabritius is beautiful. It’s just a shame the book wasn’t. Okay, I guess I ran out of positives, cos let’s face it I really did not like this book.

The most obvious issue was that it was too damn long. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve got nothing against long books. In fact, nothing gives me more pleasure than sinking my teeth into a really hefty, beautiful book. But this book was at best mediocre- and I hate wasting hours of my time on mediocrity.

Because it is *at best* mediocre. Even when a bomb *literally goes off* the narrative style remains the same. It is slow, plodding and filled with tangential details. There is no contrast in speeds or intensity- which makes me wonder if the author has any control over her narrative. In fact, it becomes pretty clear the author has no emotional range as the book progresses. I mean, it’s about a boy that has just lost his mother, and all we get from him is something along the lines of “I was feeling bad but didn’t show it”. I hate to cite the “show don’t tell” rule, but seriously, this had me grinding my teeth in frustration. Where was the psychological trauma? Where was the expression of pain? I mean, give me something for crying out loud!

But no, that fell flat. Much like the rest of the book. I mean it was only propped up by flat cardboard characters. Not one of them felt real. Initially, when the mother was introduced as this fragmented, idealised figure, I thought it made sense that the narrator would idealise her after she died. But then, as the plot went on, I realised none of the characters had any personality or originality to make them feel like anything more than a faint sketch of a human being. They were all just type-casts. There was The Mobster, The Money Grabbing Father, The Evil Stepmother (I kid you not, this was a character), The Rebel (Boris- who also filled the sanctimonious preachy role), and The Kindly Old Man. I found myself rolling my eyes as cliché after cliché stepped out of the woodwork to join a rather exhaustive list of uninteresting caricatures.

On top of that, it took ages for the plot to go anywhere. And then when things did happen I found myself questioning everything. I didn’t understand why he had to go to Vegas; I didn’t understand why he came back. Heck- I didn’t understand why it went in any direction. Unfortunately, by the time the strands all came together at the end and it started to make sense, it was too late to save my interest.

And then there was the ending! *Groans all around*. I have to give the book a tiny slither of credit in that the heist itself was entertaining. But even with that slight glimmer of hope that there was something to salvage from this 800-page-chore, the ending had such huge plot holes I could’ve driven a bus through them. I mean- for starters- how did they manage to get away without the police asking questions *and* get the reward money *and* go off to live happily ever after. It didn’t make much sense, but then, there were plenty of other things that didn’t make sense in the book.

Then of course, there was the ending that Tartt tagged on so she could be “profound”. This involved the Kindly Old Man stepping in to give a “nice” speech about the power of art (or whatever). And she uses Hobie to do it- even though it makes no sense since he’s just been lied to by the boy he took in- just because he is a convenient voice for her pretentious ramblings.

But the funny thing is, she didn’t even understand how exquisitely ironic it was to quote Picasso saying: “Good artists copy, great artists steal”. I mean, by lifting those words and plonking them in her book like a talisman, I’m sure she thought she was “stealing”. In actuality she was just copying. If she had caught the sentiment and expressed it in her art, then it would have been stealing. Yet sadly, Tartt does not know her craft as well as she thinks she does.

What she failed to understand when she inserted that quote into her book is that good art never has to justify itself. Great art does not need other art to prop it up. Copying that quote just reeked of pretention. And that pretentiousness underscores the reason why this book is so long: it was not long because it had to be, but because the author is self-indulgent.

And for all that the best rating I can feasibly give is:

Rating: 2/5 bananas

half bananahalf banana

(That’s with me trying my best not to be too trigger happy, docking bananas as I went, and judging it on how “good” it was overall)

Alrighty then- agree? Disagree? Just want some bananas? Let me know in the comments below!

38 thoughts on “An Exhaustive Study of Why the Goldfinch is Too Long

  1. HALLELUJAH!!!!! I picked up this book because everyone was loving it (at first), and I read like 30 pages and put it down forever. Dickensian to the highest degree. I just couldn’t continue it was so boring. It kind of reminded me of Catcher in the Rye but at least that was short. *Hissing forever*.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. hahaha so glad you agree!!! I wish I’d given it up, but my brother assured me it gets better- he was wrong- there’s about 50 pages towards the end that are decent, but it’s not worth trawling through 800 pages of boredom for! Yeah, I wouldn’t even say it’s as good as that, cos at least I felt *something* while reading Catcher in the Rye- even if that something was annoyance! Grr makes me so mad that I wasted so much time on this book!! *Echoes hissing*

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Uh oh!!! This has been in my TBR since last year, I remembered moving it out because of its length but again I put it in because some says it was great. But after reading your all honesty and all critical post, I guess I am erasing it completely. I’ve read only a few chapters and it actually made me a bit sleepy… So I guess I would have to agree with you. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yeah- I heard sooo many people raving about this one- and it came as a recommendation. My brother gave me his copy and kept nagging me saying “Have you read the Goldfinch yet”. Funnily enough, it’s not a book he was crazy about- I think he was just doing it to wind me up :/ It’s really not worth slogging through 800 pages. It’s a very boring book and I nearly gave up at the beginning too- I wish I had!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Haha I actually really liked The Goldfinch on a really weird level that I can’t quite explain. But I absolutely know what you mean, it is way too long and definitely just plods along for no particular reason! Also, I love reviews that go against the status quo. Go you 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    1. haha that’s fair enough- this book came as a recommendation from my brother and he keeps arguing that it’s not as bad as I’m making out- which it probably isn’t. He keeps saying it’s not a bad book, but it would have been better if it would have been better if it had been 200 pages shorter (I agree- but I think it could have been 400 pages shorter). It’s one of those things- if a book is too long and I feel like I’ve wasted my time, or it’s overhyped and doesn’t live up to expectations, then I will be bitterly disappointed with it. haha thanks so much!! 😉

      Liked by 1 person

  4. One banana for you for finishing it anyway! 🙂 Donna Tartt’s books are in my TBR list because I keep reading how good they are but I keep pushing them away. Sometimes I get wary when people unanimously love a book so I’m glad to have a different point of view for once.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. haha exactly- and another one for the heist. (I was feeling pretty generous!) Yeah it’s better to have lower expectations anyway in my opinion, cos if it turns out to be bad then at least you weren’t as disappointed, and if it’s good you’ll enjoy it more.


  5. I haven’t read the book, but your review was very entertaining, at least! XD Thanks for that. I’m just sorry you had to go through hours of reading to get through it. I have a hard time putting down a book I’ve started… even when it’s awful. For me, it was “Deerskin” by Robin McKinley. Yuck. Just all the way through. 😛

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks very much! haha yeah it was torture! Me too- I try to give up more now, but I struggle to give up if I’ve invested too much time in it already- especially if it was a recommendation- which this one was. I’ve not heard of that- but I will avoid it- what makes it so terrible out of interest?

      Liked by 1 person

  6. After seeing this book literally everywhere I was considering picking it up and reading it, but after this review it’s a big fat no! Long books about nothing = a waste of time. Thank you for the heads-up, and an awesome review 😀

    Liked by 1 person

  7. I think your review is accurate and fair. I did move reading it though. I like reading ‘palette cleanser’ books between the heavy stuff, so I might have picked this book up at the right time.

    It was very cliché, I have to agree. Good review!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. I have been listening to the audio version for three weeks (mostly commuting). I finally googled the Cliff Notes version to see how it ended so I could stop. It is TORTURE.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s