Reviews are for READERS

So I spent a lot of time last week talking about writing and trying to encourage writers, which almost makes me feel like I neglected the reader-y side of my blog. But *have no fear* ranty monkey is here to talk about why I think reading and reviews!

rant orangutan.png

You see, like many other people on the blogosphere I’ve noticed an ongoing problem of a certain type of author (#notall) that goes after reviewers when they get a negative review. This is obviously something that’s existed longer than I’ve been around, yet I specifically saw a video recently (that I won’t share because it names the author in question) where a vlogger described a horrible incident of an author harassing them for their 3* review. Now I’m sure I don’t have to state the obvious, but I will anyway: THIS IS NOT ON.

Still the encroachment on what reviewers do goes further than this unfortunately. Because I also see a fair number of authors, every so often, pre-emptively telling would-be readers of their work how they ought to review. Which is also NOT ON. Ultimately I hold with the view: your platform, your rules. I do not see how someone else is entitled to tell others what to do on their own site. Particularly when it comes to opinion pieces like reviews- gah! The nerve!


Personally I have my own unspoken rules of how I like to run my blog and I see a lot of other reviewers make different choices. And whether they want to discuss certain aspects of a book, leave out negative reviews or only review certain kinds of books is *completely* up to them! It’s certainly not up to the author to determine what makes a satisfactory review.

And I say this not because I think people should avoid advice or never try to improve what they do- we’re all learning things all the time- but because I am seriously sceptical about whether someone who asks for reviews to be tailored for the author’s benefit are really looking out for the reviewer’s best interests. I do not think it is right to tell readers off for not giving a book a high enough rating, or not stating how the writer can improve, or heaven forbid “not getting it” (whatever that means)- dude, it’s not for your benefit. Most of us are trying to write reviews to help out fellow readers.

Sure, you’re welcome to write each and every review as a love/hate letter to the author– that’s your prerogative. In my experience though, most critics aren’t doing that. What motivates me personally, aside from enjoying chats about *BOOKS*, is knowing that I can help fellow bookworms out from under their crushing TBRs to figure out what they *need* to read a book and what they might want to skip. That’s why even if I gush over a book, I try to tell people what it is they can expect and point out that other people might not like it. Some of my favourite books of the year fall into this category- and that’s okay! Everyone has different tastes and is entitled to their opinion.

It’s kind of unbelievable that some authors use reviews as their personal critique anyway. I mean, it is supposed to be a finished product. I hate to burst anyone’s bubble, but the time for critique should be a little earlier than the publication stage. Once it’s entered the market, it’s fair game. Especially if people have parted with time and money.

None of this is to say that authors can’t get something out of reviews. My personal view is that if a review helps an author I like then that’s *fantastic*- I obviously want all the authors I respect to have a long and illustrious career (if nothing else than for the selfish reason that I want to read *all* their future books). And guess what? People still go onto read books that are negatively received. In fact, I’ve gone out and read books I’ve seen people slate (morbid curiosity/monkey-brained masochism- call it what you will). In my experience, what actually puts readers off is whiny authors who moan about reviews.

throw books

And believe me, I get that writers poured a lot of work into it. I’m perfectly sympathetic to that. However, here’s the rub: reviewers put a lot of effort into their platforms too. No one has a monopoly on importance or conscientiousness here.

Contrary to what some writers might think, reviewers can’t control if they liked or disliked a book. Nor are they “out to get” anyone or likely to have personal vendettas against (often unknown) authors. Yet what reviewers do depend on is their ability to critique a book on its merit– and to start meddling with that undermines the whole process.

So I’ll say for the record: my reviews are for readers. Writers who think otherwise can kindly back away- I have bananas and I’m not afraid to use them!


How about you? Do you think reviews are for readers or authors? Let me know in the comments!


99 thoughts on “Reviews are for READERS

  1. Winged Cynic says:

    Haha beware banana grenades? 😉 I absolutely agree with this post! I think that sometimes reviewers can get too personal and say unnecessarily mean things about an author they don’t know, but for those people, I think the rest of the world can see that it says more about the reviewer than it does the author (at least, I don’t take those reviews as seriously), so authors don’t need to get so defensive. Also, authors put their work out there to be critiqued, so they need to know how to cope with harsh book reviews whether it’s justified or not. It’s ultimately someone’s opinion, and you don’t have a right to police them. Awesome discussion!


  2. shai @ cadeunderbooks says:

    Fab post! I recently came across a post talking about one reviewer’s interactions with an author who even included a note in their ARC about “Please be sure not to spoil anything in your review! We wouldn’t want to ruin the experience for other readers so etc” And I thought that was so strange! The reviewer went in to more detail because the author did seem to be pushing for reactionary pieces (“This was great! I loved the action! etc”) rather than actual reviews. Which ??? Sometimes it is just fun to gush about something you love, and I think a reviewer can be careful with spoilers, but to preemptively censor people? Not cool.


  3. lostartofreadingblog says:

    I think authors should appreciate an honest review. Maybe learn something about their writing style to improve on. I had an author thank me once for some constructive criticism, because one part didn’t work for me. Let’s face it not everyone is going too like any book, suck it up haha. Great post!!


  4. Kat Impossible says:

    Obviously I am happy when an author sees my review, it was a good one and that made their day. Like, yay for good vibes! But whenever my reviews aren’t in the upper-star area, I am still entitled to my opinion and do my best to explain why I personally didn’t like it. I don’t want to have to worry about an author barging in and getting all defensive over what I wrote. Reviews are definitely for readers, so that they can judge more easily whether they’d like a book or not. Love this post!!


  5. annelogan17 says:

    I couldn’t agree more! Luckily I’ve never had any writers attack me for negative reviews, although I rarely pan a book on my blog, I do point out things that could be improved or that I didn’t like. I definitely write my reviews for other readers, first and foremost.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s