Being Objective About Some of My Favourite Books

Well you guys know I’m all about the objectivity when reviewing 😉 Just kidding! But I do occasionally like to try to get a little beyond my initial emotional response, such as talking about how some books are perfectly imperfect as I make them out to be and recommending books I didn’t like. Today, I decided to flip that on its head and talk about some books I do love, yet talking more about their downsides, so you get a fuller picture of what to expect than my usual GUSH. Because apparently I am a masochist I like a challenge. This was really tricky, not just cos it’s hard to critique something you adore, but I also didn’t want to pick books people like to trash talk. Plus, if you want pure negativity, maybe look at a negative review! 😉 Anyway, enough of the preamble, let’s jump into it!

The Great Gatsby– I’m starting with Gatsby because, while it’s one of my favourite books, I understand why a lot of people don’t love it. Fitzgerald is the King of Purple Prose. Plus, it’s fairly propagandistic (as is the case with a lot of American literature centred around the American Dream- you know what it’s getting at before you start reading). Not to mention that, as I once heard said, “there’s not a single likeable character in it”. For some reason none of that bothers me- I just think it’s an excellent depiction of human behaviour, it’s multi-layered enough to have universal themes and the writing is to die for.  

East of Eden– speaking of great American literature, this is one of my personal faves. That said, I noticed in a response I had to a post recently that it’s not everyone’s personal pick. And that’s totally fair- as the criticism said, it has a lot more exposition and (as I’ve noticed) it’s a lot more sprawling than his other work. And yet, though it doesn’t have that tight form of Steinbeck’s more popular works, I still kinda love it more. The characters for me leap off the page and feel more like family.

Lorna Doone– this is a book which isn’t perfect by a long shot. I was a kid when I read this, so I’m sure the (admittedly rather obvious) plot points will not be particularly surprising to an adult. Still, it’s a very entertaining, sensationalised story. Definitely an enjoyable read, if nothing else.

Shadow on the Wind– I do occasionally see criticism of this beloved book and my first response is always “WHAT?! You don’t love it?!” So I may struggle with objectivity for this one. It is a truly immersive and beautiful book, but in fairness to the haters critics, it is not fast paced (which, in my opinion, lends itself to the atmosphere). I also agree that it’s highly descriptive (which comes down to personal preference). Fairer to say that it weaves through the labyrinthine streets of Barcelona at a meandering pace. And I also understand that it’s frequently miss-marketed as a mystery or (more bizarrely still) a thriller. If you do want to try it out, look at it more as a piece of literary fiction about the beauty of books and you’ll be more satisfied for it!

Daughter of Smoke and Bone– hmm if you want objectivity for this book then you may have come to the wrong place 😉 Okay let’s give this a go- I guess if you don’t want to read a book with beautiful writing, intriguing characters, a great love story and spectacular world building then this won’t be for you… 😉 Alright- I guess you could call said beautiful writing prose very flowery and (while I think it isn’t technically instalove) I also get why people feel that way (just a little). It’s still really imaginative and Laini Taylor is one of my favourite writers, so. You. Should. Read. It.

Red Rising– this is probably my *favourite ever sci fi series*- which means it’s not going to be easy to have any level of objectivity for it! That said, I think Darrow would want me to be reasonable and measured here. I can say that it has a slower opening than a lot of people were expecting. Not only was I forewarned, but I’m actually so geeky about classics, that I LOVED how the world building linked so much to Roman culture. That said, I get why people would be (a little) peeved that it takes an unusually long time to get to the inciting incident. I also understand why people say that it’s similar to Hunger Games (though BLOODYDAMN it ends up doing something very different and is much more adult!)

Black Magician’s Trilogy– this is one of my favourite series that it’s actually easier for me to critique because, yes, I get that it’s not perfect. The first book was slow and there was much too much telling (especially in the way of world building infodumps). THAT SAID, it’s entirely worth sticking with. I was lucky enough to have a friend that told me to stick with it- so now I guess I’m doing the same for you- if you try this series, stick with it!

Hazel Wood– this was one that was one where the criticism was a little closer to home- literally, because my sister didn’t like it! That said, her criticism that it was too graphic was valid. Also, I read a lot of reviews that complained it was too slow paced and that it took ages to get to the actual hazel wood. All of which is fair… I just didn’t mind the slower pace because I felt the wonderful writing, world building and characters balanced it out!

Circe– Oho- such a hard one!! I have seen a couple of negative reviews (because even masterpieces like this have detractors 😉) but I can admit it’s fair when people call it slow. Expect a more languid pace for this one- it’s not designed to be an Achillean sprint. This takes place over hundreds of years, stringing countless myths together into a story arc and developing character in a unique way. It’s both very modern and ancient in its telling. It’s basically a work of pure genius… and yes I’m still being objective!

Wolf in the Whale– oof I understand why people don’t love this (although I will continue to recommend it because it’s so different to anything I’ve ever read). This is an account of history that’s never been explored- the meeting of Inuit and Viking. Yet for that, it’s realistic historically and has some graphic assault scenes. I completely understand why it’s over the line for some people- normally I’d feel the same way. Except I personally felt so absorbed in this other world and thought the atmosphere was incredible.

Bear and the Nightingale– this is another atmospheric read that I’m going to struggle to critique. I think in this case, it might be best to read Briana’s review, where she explains why it’s not great that it engages in the (all too common trope) of making the religious characters are portrayed as fanatics. I can see her point- HOWEVER I have to defend this series as a whole- over the course of the trilogy Arden really gives this aspect far more nuance. It show you a purer and good hearted alternative.  I thought it managed to balance the complex culture of Russia and its history by the end. The other main criticism that this gets is that it starts slow and that the action is over in a blur- which I can see to an extent. In retrospect, this is more about building relationships, characters and sets the scene for what’s to come. I get that this won’t be for everyone, but I can still recommend giving it a go over a hot chocolate on a chilly night!

I didn’t do the worst job of being objective… although perhaps not the best either! 😉 What do you think? Was I fair here? Do you have any critiques to add? Or, most importantly, have any of you been tempted into reading any of these? Let me know in the comments!


30 thoughts on “Being Objective About Some of My Favourite Books

  1. The Great Gatsby is one of my favorite books too <3, but I totally get the criticism behind it. What captured me about it though was the prose, like you mentioned, and the humanness of the characters. Just how they interact and, honestly, just who they are really is just like people we meet everyday in our lives. Gatsby himself is one of my favorite literary characters of all time because, though he may be fanciful and disillusioned, his pining for Daisy is just so relatable. Don't we all pine for people we can't have? 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I don’t bother trying to be objective any more. If I like a book, I’ll gladly trumpet all the reasons it is the best book since sliced bread. If I didn’t like it, I’ll gladly drag the author through the mud they created with the book 😀
    Which is why my reviews are for me first, my followers second and everyone else third. You have to get to know me to really get the most out of my reviews.

    It also explains why I stay at the level of blogging that I am 😉

    So, great job trying to be objective and if that’s your thing, good luck with it in the future, hahahahahaaa 😀

    Liked by 2 people

  3. It’s hard to be objective about favorites. Especially when they have a strong emotional connection to you- hearing someone criticize them can be like hearing someone criticize a friend! Well it feels that way to me anyway. But of course I understand that different people value and respond to different things in literature.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I thought Gatsby was great as well, definitely agree that the characters are unlikeable but for me it just made the whole tale that little bit more believable. I can definitely see why it receives criticism though. Great post, I don’t think I’d manage to be that objective with my favourites 😂


  5. Yep, it is really hard being objective. I definitely agree with your points on The Great Gatsby. I kind of understand why people would criticise The Bear and the Nightingale for that but my memory’s a bit fuzzy on that point. Guess I’ll just have to reread it!


  6. I liked The Great Gatsby much more when I reread it recently than it when I initially read it in high school. I still didn’t “like” any of the characters, but I guess I understood more of where Fitzgerald was going with the characterization. (Maybe I was less jaded in high school too….)

    Liked by 1 person

  7. I LOOOOOVE Red Rising too! Some of my friends hate it because they feel it’s really sexist and honestly I can totally see that especially in the first book. I do feel like some of that is less prevalent later but book 1 definitely has its issues. It’s tough when you love something so much to take a step back and be objective about it sometimes haha.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. I have to confess to being one of those horrible people who REALLY dislikes The Shadow of the Wind! It’s just not my thing at all. In fact, it was this book that made me realize that I really, truly, do not like “modern gothic” fiction. (I disliked The Thirteenth Tale, too.) It’s nothing on the book or the author–just pure personal taste.


  9. I think you were fair. Sometimes it can be hard to be that objective when you really love something. The Great Gatsby is one of my favs too and I actually like it for its purple prose. If not for that, I wouldn’t like the book. I don’t care for the story at all. I just really like the writing.


  10. I have. I have been tempted to read all of them. (OK, ALMOST all. I am not going to commit to the Red Rising series because it seems like the premise is straight-up oppressor vs. oppressed class war. And I always fee kind of attacked by those.)

    I think I am like you in my preferences, namely that I don’t mind a slow start and lots of slow and careful world- and relationship-building, especially in cases where it all comes together and all that slow buildup results in far more drama and depth of symbolism than you could ever get with a faster start!

    Ursula le Guin’s books are like this, too, but I know that you know this and may get to them … eventually …

    BTW, if you want an ARC of a slow-burn fantasy with lots of world-building, pop on over to my blog and use the contact button to send me your snail-mail address. I’ll send you a copy of my upcoming book, The Long Guest. I know any review you post of it will be completely objective! 😀


  11. Just quietly, all of the books on here that I have read (except for Gatsby, but that’s more about me not liking the ingenuity of the characters than the book itself) are all books that I have LOVED. DOSAB, Bear, and the Hazel Wood are all brilliant stories (but I’m not always here for the fast paced action, and my absolute favourite story is one that is told in the quiet, still moments of the book).
    I also feel more prepared to read Circe, Red Rising and Trudi Canavan’s series now, so thank you?!!


  12. Haha I love this. I cannot be objective about Circe. I love it too much. Also, what’s wrong with stories that are slow? I love slow books. Life isn’t all about being grabbed by the throat – there is something so delicious and immersive about the gradual unfolding. Circe goes on a journey!

    I don’t know why I am trying to persuade you to love a book you already love. Like I said, objectivity isn’t in my blood 😂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s